PandaONE vs Annual Penetration Testing
An annual pentest tests a snapshot of your app from one point in time. PandaONE tests every deploy — and delivers findings in hours, not weeks.
Annual penetration tests are necessary for compliance but inadequate for modern software delivery. Teams ship hundreds of deploys between engagements. PandaONE closes that gap — not to replace pentests, but to make the ground between them as safe as the tested snapshot.
Head-to-head comparison
| Capability | PandaONE | Manual Pentest |
|---|---|---|
| Tests every deploy, not once a year | ||
| Results in hours | ||
| Opens fix as a pull request | ||
| Covers new code written after the engagement | ||
| Validated proof-of-concept exploits | ||
| Compliance report for auditors | ||
| Human judgment on complex chains | ||
| Flat, predictable cost |
Why teams choose PandaONE
- Continuous coverage between annual engagements
- Results in hours — not the 2–4 week report cycle
- Costs a fraction of a manual engagement
- Every finding ships with a ready-to-merge fix
Where Manual Pentest still shines
- Human creativity for novel attack chains
- Recognized by compliance auditors as a formal assessment
- Better for complex business logic requiring deep context
See what PandaONE finds in your app
Free plan. No credit card. First findings in 30 minutes.
Also compare