PandaONE vs XBOW — both autonomous, different price points
XBOW is enterprise-grade autonomous hacking at $4,000–$8,000 per test. PandaONE delivers the same continuous, exploit-validated coverage for engineering teams at $30/month.
XBOW is a serious product — ranked #1 on HackerOne and proven on Microsoft's MSRC leaderboard. But at $4k–8k per on-demand test it's built for enterprise security teams with dedicated budgets. PandaONE is built for engineering teams shipping daily who need the same exploit-validated coverage running on every PR.
Head-to-head comparison
| Capability | PandaONE | XBOW |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomous attack agents (no human operator) | ||
| Exploit-validated findings (no false positives) | ||
| Continuous testing on every PR/deploy | ||
| Opens fix as a pull request | ||
| Multi-step attack chain simulation | ||
| Results in under 30 minutes | ||
| Flat monthly pricing (no per-test cost) | ||
| GitHub / CI integration |
Why teams choose PandaONE
- Auto-fix PR for every confirmed finding — XBOW only reports
- $30/month flat vs $4,000–$8,000 per test — same exploit validation
- Runs on every deploy, not triggered on-demand by a human
- Native GitHub, GitLab, and CI/CD integration out of the box
Where XBOW still shines
- Proven #1 on HackerOne against human researchers
- Enterprise compliance: SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, NIS 2
- Recognised by MSRC — strong for enterprise credibility
See what PandaONE finds in your app
Free plan. No credit card. First findings in 30 minutes.
Also compare